Tiny URLs

I don't like them. Tiny URLs, that is. Those short things that look like web addresses (they are!) but give no clue to what their targets are. They have become commonplace enough now, though, and it's time to react.

I really don't like them.

Here's why: They look just like those little URLs that used to be well hidden in seemingly legitimate spam emails. Every time I see them, my first thought is spam. If I follow that link, someone will exploit a weakness in my browser to gain control over my machine or empty my credit card, somehow. And yes, I know, it won't really happen but I've lived with spam for a long time and I don't trust anything that cannot be deciphered simply by looking at it. I'm a bit silly in that respect. Yes, I realise there are benefits with using short URLs when tweeting, when your available space in counted in characters, but that's another instinctive dislike of mine: What's the point of messages forced to be short in such an arbitrary manner?

Yes, I use Twitter myself (mostly to keep track of stuff such as my favourite XML conference, XML Prague) and I fully understand the need of short URLs in tweets. You don't really want to waste the available space with a URL, if at all possible. It's a neat way of solving a problem, but a problem that is extremely artificial to begin with, to make room for other characters in an arbitrarily limited message.

But above all, I don't trust tiny URLs because I can't see what they are about. They are just characters preceded by "http://" and they look every bit as sneaky as that link you just know will break your machine.